?

Log in

No account? Create an account

To · Talk · of · Many · Things · ...


California's Proposition 8

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · Profile

* * *
The federal judge ruling that California's Proposition 8 was unconstitutional didn't surprise me. And I suppose it's no great surprise that some folks will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court. I will be disappointed if the high court is willing to hear their arguments. Denial of equal rights is clearly unconstitutional. It's time we removed this injustice from state law.

Some would argue that the intent of our founding fathers was to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples. The argument is there. Many of our American ancestors had a very narrow view of equality; a view that we find offensive today. Fortunately, over the years, our original Constitution has been amended to clarify and extend the meaning of equality.

I've heard that the major proponent of California's Proposition 8 was a coalition of Christian organizations who believe that God only wants heterosexuals to form life partnerships, to be happy, and to reap the benefits of the union of marriage. Okay. Folks in those organizations can believe and do that. It's their right guaranteed by our Constitution. I've heard that there are other Christian groups that believe it is okay for same-sex couples to marry and form life partnerships. That's okay too. And it's also guaranteed by our Constitution.

Many want to narrowly define the legality of marriage so it suits their own needs and beliefs. They forget that the institution of marriage originated in prehistorical times. Marriage predates Christianity by thousands of years, even here in America. It doesn't belong to any particular religion or to existing religions at all.

Today, at the very basic level, marriage requires a license from some civil authority. Kathy and I purchased ours from a clerk at the county courthouse. The next level requires a licensed official to perform a marriage ceremony in front of witnesses. It was lunchtime at the courthouse, and Kathy and I had difficulty finding a judge to marry us. We finally found one who was willing to pause his lunch for the ceremony. It was a memorable occasion for us and exactly what we wanted.

Some folk require more in the way of a ceremony and are more particular about the licensed person who marries them. Often, these particular licensed agents have additional requirements. Usually, the additional requirements are religious in nature and can vary considerably.

I once read that there are over 32,000 different Protestant Christian organizations in the United States. Add to that number all the other religions we have here, and you will find quite a huge diversity of beliefs about what marriage is and what the requirements for getting married are. Those beliefs are all protected by our Constitution.
* * *
* * *
[User Picture]
On August 7th, 2010 03:10 am (UTC), lovimoment commented:
Speaking of odd beliefs, when my sister got married (won't say where), they would not let her and my brother-in-law play "their song" at the ceremony OR the reception because it was not sung by a Christian artist. (It's a country song.) Never mind that it was not in any way dirty or suggestive or inappropriate for a ceremonious occasion - it was not on the church's list of approved songs by approved "artists." She found this out only two weeks before the wedding. If she'd known, she would have had the wedding elsewhere. It was really quite sad. It made me glad we went with a courthouse wedding instead.
* * *

Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Share · Next Entry